<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP C5280 quality vs. CVS quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kamens.us/2008/04/09/hp-c5280-quality-vs-cvs-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kamens.us/2008/04/09/hp-c5280-quality-vs-cvs-quality/</link>
	<description>Musings of an indignant mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: abbasegal</title>
		<link>http://blog.kamens.us/2008/04/09/hp-c5280-quality-vs-cvs-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-101946</link>
		<dc:creator>abbasegal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kamens.brookline.ma.us/~jik/wordpress/?p=202#comment-101946</guid>
		<description>I see it now -- thanks!

I admit, for years now, despite being basically a do-it-yourselfer, I have just been getting prints from ofoto/Kodak Easyshare.  A number of years ago Consumer Reports did an analysis pointing out that print-it-yourself prints came in (at the time) at almost $.50 per print when you included the paper, ink, and printer wear and tear, while at the time the services were charging $.30/print (less during sales).  In addition, you didn&#039;t have the hassle of fighting with your printer!  Since then, prices at the services have come down to ~$.15/print, and though I bet home-printing prices have come down too, they still probably don&#039;t beat the services&#039; prices.

I also don&#039;t really trust the home-ink-based processes to be as high-quality or last as long as the photo-chemical based processes the labs use.

Being able to print the occasional snapshot is nice, especially when our kids come home from gan with a note &quot;please bring in a picture tomorrow&quot; -- now I don&#039;t need to raid the albums, I can take a picture and print it on the spot, without caring so much about quality.   We still order from Easyshare  -- with a big enough order it is still even worth it having them shipped abroad, and with a smaller order, if a relative is coming to visit, we have them schlep it.   

I know there must be Israeli services we could use, but inertia is a heavy thing to overcome... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see it now &#8212; thanks!</p>
<p>I admit, for years now, despite being basically a do-it-yourselfer, I have just been getting prints from ofoto/Kodak Easyshare.  A number of years ago Consumer Reports did an analysis pointing out that print-it-yourself prints came in (at the time) at almost $.50 per print when you included the paper, ink, and printer wear and tear, while at the time the services were charging $.30/print (less during sales).  In addition, you didn&#8217;t have the hassle of fighting with your printer!  Since then, prices at the services have come down to ~$.15/print, and though I bet home-printing prices have come down too, they still probably don&#8217;t beat the services&#8217; prices.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t really trust the home-ink-based processes to be as high-quality or last as long as the photo-chemical based processes the labs use.</p>
<p>Being able to print the occasional snapshot is nice, especially when our kids come home from gan with a note &#8220;please bring in a picture tomorrow&#8221; &#8212; now I don&#8217;t need to raid the albums, I can take a picture and print it on the spot, without caring so much about quality.   We still order from Easyshare  &#8212; with a big enough order it is still even worth it having them shipped abroad, and with a smaller order, if a relative is coming to visit, we have them schlep it.   </p>
<p>I know there must be Israeli services we could use, but inertia is a heavy thing to overcome&#8230; <img src='http://blog.kamens.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

