<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gross hack of the day: adding names to Vonage voicemail email notifications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kamens.us/2009/12/29/gross-hack-of-the-day-adding-names-to-vonage-voicemail-email-notifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kamens.us/2009/12/29/gross-hack-of-the-day-adding-names-to-vonage-voicemail-email-notifications/</link>
	<description>Musings of an indignant mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jik</title>
		<link>http://blog.kamens.us/2009/12/29/gross-hack-of-the-day-adding-names-to-vonage-voicemail-email-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-105326</link>
		<dc:creator>jik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kamens.brookline.ma.us/~jik/wordpress/?p=1185#comment-105326</guid>
		<description>Wait, you&#039;re saying that in the past, Vonage voicemail notifications &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; include the name of the caller?  Because I&#039;ve never seen that since I started using Vonage a few months ago.  Perhaps my account was put on one of the &quot;new voicemail servers&quot; you mentioned?

I find this unfathomable.  Why would they get rid of useful functionality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, you&#8217;re saying that in the past, Vonage voicemail notifications <em>did</em> include the name of the caller?  Because I&#8217;ve never seen that since I started using Vonage a few months ago.  Perhaps my account was put on one of the &#8220;new voicemail servers&#8221; you mentioned?</p>
<p>I find this unfathomable.  Why would they get rid of useful functionality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Neff</title>
		<link>http://blog.kamens.us/2009/12/29/gross-hack-of-the-day-adding-names-to-vonage-voicemail-email-notifications/comment-page-1/#comment-105325</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Neff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kamens.brookline.ma.us/~jik/wordpress/?p=1185#comment-105325</guid>
		<description>Just got off phone w/ Vonage.  Call was escalated, and an engineer provided this tidbit of info: Vonage is migrating everyone to new voicemail servers. The new voicemail servers do not include caller&#039;s name in the body of the notification email.  Example:

Vonage Voicemail Notification format from old server:

Date: MMM DD YYYY HH:MM:SS tt
From: First Last (12345678910)
To  : First Last (12345678910)

Vonage Voicemail Notification format from new server:

Date: MMM DD YYYY HH:MM:SS tt
From: 12345678910
To  : First Last (12345678910)

The tech who I was speaking to (who, himself, did database work) suggested that perhaps Vonage is stripping this information for space reasons. He also did say that Vonage just isn&#039;t really big on CallerID name. They do support CallerID name, but just if the number was brought thru a port from another carrier.

Just thought I&#039;d pass this along.

Thanks!,
-Aaron Neff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got off phone w/ Vonage.  Call was escalated, and an engineer provided this tidbit of info: Vonage is migrating everyone to new voicemail servers. The new voicemail servers do not include caller&#8217;s name in the body of the notification email.  Example:</p>
<p>Vonage Voicemail Notification format from old server:</p>
<p>Date: MMM DD YYYY HH:MM:SS tt<br />
From: First Last (12345678910)<br />
To  : First Last (12345678910)</p>
<p>Vonage Voicemail Notification format from new server:</p>
<p>Date: MMM DD YYYY HH:MM:SS tt<br />
From: 12345678910<br />
To  : First Last (12345678910)</p>
<p>The tech who I was speaking to (who, himself, did database work) suggested that perhaps Vonage is stripping this information for space reasons. He also did say that Vonage just isn&#8217;t really big on CallerID name. They do support CallerID name, but just if the number was brought thru a port from another carrier.</p>
<p>Just thought I&#8217;d pass this along.</p>
<p>Thanks!,<br />
-Aaron Neff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

