Archive for the ‘Journalism’ Category

The “modern invention” of “green burials”

Monday, February 18th, 2008

The Scripps News wire recently ran a story which the Boston Herald picked up, ‘Green’ burials get a boost.

Apparently, the idea of burying someone wrapped in a simple shroud, in a plain wooden coffin, with no embalming and no concrete vault, is so revolutionary that it deserves news coverage.

Admittedly, the “green burial” movement introduces one new concept that traditional Jewish burial practices don’t employ — burial “in a woodland, where a new tree or a stone marks the grave.” Other than that, it sounds just like how Jews have been burying their dead for at least a thousand years. I was sufficiently amused that I dashed off this letter to the editor of the Herald, although I don’t know if they’ll print it:

To the editor:

If forgoing embalming, metal caskets and burial vaults exemplify “good old-fashioned Yankee simplicity and frugality” (“Eco-friendly consumers really dig green burials”, Feb. 18), then apparently the Jewish people have been Yankees for thousands of years.

The assertion that green burials are a modern invention is almost as funny as the statement I read recently on-line, “I guess Jesus knew what he was doing calling for the observance of the Sabbath.”

As we are taught in the Jewish Bible (Ecclesiastes 1:9), “There is nothing new under the sun.”

Jonathan Kamens

Seen in today’s Boston Herald…

Wednesday, December 5th, 2007

Apparently, the reporter knows how to spell, even if the headline writer doesn’t.

Or maybe the headline writer is trying to suggest that Mitt Romney is more of a man than the other candidates?

Idealism vs. pragmatism in genocide prevention

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has set off a firestorm by refusing to endorse House Resolution 106, which calls upon the Federal government to recognize the Armenian genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century.

The ADL’s position is consistent with their longstanding policy not to get involved in the debate. They don’t deny that the genocide took place; indeed, there are passing references to it on their Web site as a fact of history. What they have declined to do is to enter into the debate over Turkey’s stubborn refusal to come to grips with its own history.

This story recently broke into the media when the ADL’s New England region broke ranks with the national organization and called for a change in policy, leading to the abrupt firing of the regional director, Andrew H. Tarsy.

Tarsy has been quoted describing the ADL’s policy as “morally indefensible.” A Boston Globe editorial opined, “One shouldn’t play geopolitics with genocide.” A Web search yields not a single author supporting the ADL.

In fact, the issue is not so simple. As paradoxical as it may seem, the ADL is right not to get involved, and the pundits and politicians are right to condemn them for it.

(more…)

Boston Herald fails to cover pro-Israel rally

Saturday, July 22nd, 2006

I just sent this letter to the editor of the Boston Herald:

(more…)

Plagiarism? Help me decide.

Friday, October 14th, 2005

Please take a look at these two recently published articles I stumbled across, in particular the highlighted sections, and comment on whether you think they warrant a complaint to the editors of The Jewish Week and a heads-up to the editors of the New York Times.
(more…)