<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Something better to do &#187; pool covers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kamens.us/tag/pool-covers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kamens.us</link>
	<description>Musings of an indignant mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Letter in today&#8217;s Herald: backyard pools are a safety hazard</title>
		<link>http://blog.kamens.us/2010/07/20/letter-in-todays-herald-backyard-pools-are-a-safety-hazard/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kamens.us/2010/07/20/letter-in-todays-herald-backyard-pools-are-a-safety-hazard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pool covers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pool safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kamens.us/?p=1650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent tragedy, twin toddlers drowned in their family&#8217;s backyard in-ground pool. Two articles in a row in the Boston Herald mentioned that the authorities were investigating how the twins drowned despite the fact that the pool had a cover. There seems to be a widespread misconception, which the Herald articles exacerbate, that pool [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1268670" target="_blank">recent tragedy</a>, twin toddlers drowned in their family&#8217;s backyard in-ground pool.</p>
<p>Two articles in a row in the <em>Boston Herald</em> mentioned that the authorities were investigating how the twins drowned despite the fact that the pool had a cover.</p>
<p>There seems to be a widespread misconception, which the <em>Herald</em> articles exacerbate, that pool covers are a safety device. In my <a href="http://bostonherald.com/news/opinion/letters/view.bg?articleid=1269026" target="_blank">letter in today&#8217;s Herald</a>, I tried to set the record straight:</p>
<h2>Safety hazard</h2>
<p><!--//Byline box//--><span class="bold">Tuesday, July 20, 2010</span></p>
<p><!--//Byline box end//--> <!--// tool box//--> <!--//tool box end//--> <!-- //Patriots Report Card Sponsorship Ad Unit// --> <!-- //END Patriots Report Card Sponsorship Ad Unit// --> <!--//article and page numbers//--></p>
<div id="articleFull" class="articleFull">
<p><span class="articleBegin">A</span> pool cover is not a safety device; it is  intended to keep the pool clean, not prevent drownings. In fact, pool  covers make pools less safe for children (“Police to study security tape  in tots’ drowning,” July 19).</p>
<p>My heart goes out to the parents, but it disturbs me to see officials  claiming they did everything right. If that had been the case, then it  would have been impossible for the children to access the pool  unsupervised. There is a reason why many insurance companies refuse to  issue policies to homes with pools.</p>
<p>- Jonathan Kamens, Brighton</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kamens.us/2010/07/20/letter-in-todays-herald-backyard-pools-are-a-safety-hazard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

