My wife, who is a “Slate Plus” subscriber over at Slate, received this email today:
When she shared it with me, I observed an obvious, immediate red flag: the email does not say what was changed in the new policy, or offer a link to something the recipient can read to find out what has changed. This is always a bad sign, which means one of two things: either the company changing its privacy policy doesn’t want you to know what has changed, or they have no idea themselves what has changed so they can’t tell you.
After carefully reviewing Slate’s new privacy policy, I think it’s almost certainly the latter. The new policy was obviously created by incompetent clowns, and I doubt they could tell readers what the effective changes are even if they wanted to.
I don’t know what Slate’s generative AI policy is, but honestly I suspect that if they’d run the policy through generative AI and told the AI to clean it up, they would have ended up with something better than what they ended up publishing.
You probably think I’m exaggerating about how bad it is. Fair enough. I’ll show you receipts.
However, before doing that, I want to say this: the TLDR of this privacy policy is that Slate collects a ton of privacy-invasive information about you and shares it with many other companies, because they are all-in on making money by using ad-tech in privacy-invasive ways to display personalized ads to their readers. Ugh. Below is the section of the privacy policy which makes this most clear. They can’t even get this right; the second paragraph in this section is missing the bullet it should have to be consistent with the rest of the section.
Now, about those receipts…
Below is the second paragraph of the policy. It refers to “such information” but “information” isn’t mentioned earlier in the paragraph, so what is it talking about? Note, also, the reference to “Privacy Statement” here; for some inexplicable reason, the page in various places calls itself both a “Privacy Policy” and a “Privacy Statement”. The inconsistency is ridiculous.
Moving on. The text shown below says “and” where it should say “or”, since obviously the people reading this page are not located in all of those states at the same time (this mistake is repeated throughout the page). There is extra and missing whitespace in numerous places in these two paragraphs. The phrase “opt out” used as a verb is hyphenated when it shouldn’t be. The email address in this text should be clickable but isn’t (this mistake is repeated inconsistently throughout the page. This page should have been proofread by many people before it was published. How were these absurdly obvious errors allowed to remain in the final version?
The language of the paragraph below is repetitive gobbledegook. Furthermore, the second sentence of this paragraph does not belong in the section in which this paragraph is included, which is entitled “Information You Provide”.
The two consecutive paragraphs below are partially redundant and partially contradictory. They repeat the same bit of California law and offer two different, contradictory mechanisms for exercising the opt-out right provided by it.
The paragraph below repeats exactly the same information that was already provided earlier in the page.
The word “Us” should not be capitalized in the paragraph below. Again, how did stupid errors like this make it into the final, published version of this policy?
I can’t even with the list below. It starts out using semicolons at the end of each bullet item, then seems to be wrapping up the bulleted list by putting “; and” at the end of a bullet item and then a period at the end of the following one. All that would be fine if they didn’t then include three more bullet items terminated by periods. This is absurdly clownish.
Early on the page they claim not to collect any geolocation data. Then later on the page they talk about how they collect geolocation data. Nice, eh?
The paragraph below has an extra word that doesn’t make any sense, a “(i)” marker which implies that there’s going to be a list of multiple items but then there’s only one, and a closing quotation mark with no corresponding opening mark before it.
In the paragraph below, Slate attempts to claim that they cannot be held responsible if they allow their systems to be breached. Because they say so, that’s why. Good luck with that when the class-action lawyers come after you after the breach. “Oh, we said in our privacy policy that we’re not responsible, so you can’t sue us!” lulz

Once again in the text below, they can’t make up their fucking minds about how they’re going to end paragraphs and bullet items.
The section below once again has the “we don’t actually know how to format bulleted lists properly” problem, but it has a much bigger problem. If, as it says here, they don’t do anything with data having anything to do with financial and lending services etc., then why do they say above that the user has the right to opt out of such processing? How can the user have the right to opt out of something that Slate doesn’t do?

In the paragraph below we see a repeat of the extra whitespace problem, the unclickable email address problem, and the “and” instead of “or” problem, and they’ve added a new problem as well: they say “click here” about something that is not actually a clickable link. It looks like they intended to make the words “click here” a link but instead just pasted the URL in as unclickable text after those words. Again: how was this not caught during proofreading?
Last but not least, why does the paragraph below, which appears in a section purporting to be about the rights of users in ten different U.S. states, refer specifically to the Texas Attorney General? 🤦
This privacy policy is a joke, and Slate should be embarrassed and ashamed for publishing it.





![California prohibits a third party from reselling personal information unless you have received explicit notice and an opportunity to opt-out of further sales. The businesses listed on our Third Party Partners Page receive personal information from us and may resell that information. To opt-out of those sales, click on:
[California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Opt-Out Icon + "Cookie Preferences" button]
The CCPA prohibits a third party from reselling personal information unless you have received explicit notice and an opportunity to opt-out of further sales. The following businesses receive personal information from us and may resell that information. To opt-out of those sales, please visit the third-party opt-out notices on our Third Party Partners Page.](https://i0.wp.com/blog.kamens.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2026-05-31_20-44.png?resize=665%2C275&ssl=1)








