Slate’s new privacy policy is a dumpster fire
Slate’s new privacy policy is riddled with errors. It’s astounding that they published something so terrible. They should be embarrassed and ashamed.
Slate’s new privacy policy is riddled with errors. It’s astounding that they published something so terrible. They should be embarrassed and ashamed.
Several factors led to a mediocre experience at the motel, and their passive-aggressive response about my complaints made things worse instead of better.
No good deed goes unpunished.
A website that refuses access to critical documents is bad enough. Completely clueless chat agents who provide stock, bullshit, useless answers is much worse.
A mediocre hotel with mediocre amenities provided by its staff in a mediocre way.
Data brokers selling people’s data is not doxxing, and claiming otherwise makes you look stupid and greedy.
“share.google” links are evil. Here’s how to get Google to stop spitting them at you.
I spent nearly four hours of my time proving this isn’t my fault. I’m still doubtful that Costco will do anything to resolve the problem.
TransUnion is bad at security and bad at handling security breaches and none of this is going to get better until we have a real federal data privacy law with meaningful penalties for companies which leak people’s data.
The proposed law is a good start but it has problems that should be fixed before it is enacted. Here are some of them.