Archive for the ‘Law’ Category

How to successfully appeal a Massachusetts auto insurance (SDIP) surcharge

Friday, April 9th, 2010

My wife was involved in an auto accident last September which was not her fault — she opened the door of her parked car after confirming that no one was coming, and another driver came whipping around a corner and hit her door.  Her insurance company found her liable for the accident and issued an SDIP surcharge, because the regulations state that the person opening the door is assumed to be at fault whenever an accident like this occurs (just like the person in back is assumed to be at fault whenever one car rear-ends another).

Everyone with whom my wife spoke about the surcharge told her not to bother appealing.  Several people claimed to have waged unsuccessful appeals when they were not at fault.  The prevailing wisdom seemed to be that the system is rigged against drivers.  Nevertheless, I insisted that she appeal and even ghost-wrote her affidavit (we chose to appeal in writing rather than attending the hearing).

Today we received a notice that my wife “did demonstrate a showing necessary to rebut the governing presumption of the applicable standard of fault,” and the surcharge was vacated.  Woohoo!

Here’s the affidavit I wrote for her which was successful at getting the surcharge overturned:

(more…)

Lawyer letter from Village Automotive Group

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

I received in the mail today a letter from E. Peter Mullane, the lawyer whom Village Automotive Group has apparently retained to respond to my Chapter 93a letter about their deceptive advertising practices.

It is worth noting that E. Peter Mullane’s chief claim to fame is that he is one of the lawyers who defended John J. Connolly Jr., the former FBI agent who was convicted in federal court of racketeering, obstruction of justice, murder and conspiracy to commit murder and will be spending the rest of his life in prison.  Nice!

I am not going to publish Mullane’s letter here, because there are all kinds of legal issues with that, and… well… Mullane is a lawyer, y’know?  I will, however, publish the response I just sent him, from which you can get a pretty good idea of the claims he made in his letter.  Enjoy!

(more…)

Prohibited from participating in Allston Village Street Fair

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

Several weeks ago, I contacted Joan Pasquale, the executive director of the Parents and Community Build Group (PCBG), to inquire about the possibility of volunteers for the Obama campaign running a voter registration table at the fair.

(more…)

Torah Judaism, Homosexuality, and Gay Marriage

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

The Torah does not like gays.

For some Jews, this is not a difficult challenge to overcome. The Torah may have been inspired by God, but it was written by men. Its intolerance toward homosexuals can be written off as the outdated bigotry of a bygone age.

For others, it is not a challenge at all. The Torah is the unchanging word of God. Since it describes homosexuality as an “abomination,” then that is how it should be treated.

And then, there are the rest of us, who try to take from the best of both worlds and are faced with the challenge of reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable.

(more…)

Leave Louis Woodward alone

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

In response to “Killer nanny reinvents self as dance teacher in England” in today’s Boston Herald:

To the editor:

It is unfathomable to me why the Boston Herald thinks that how Louise Woodward is living her life is, or should be, news to your readers.

Every bit of Woodward’s conduct since Matthew Eappen’s tragic death has made it clear that even if she was responsible, it was nothing more than a tragic mistake. She is of no danger to anyone and thus should be of no interest to anyone.

It’s truly appalling to watch an unscrupulous reporter attempting to ruin Woodward’s life by spreading her past around to people who had no need to know it.

Please, leave Louise Woodward alone.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Kamens

Sprint pays up!

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

As I noted before, I was awarded a default judgment against Sprint for over $800 in small claims court. As of a month after the judgment, they still hadn’t paid or showed up in court, so at the payment hearing the court issued me a Capeas (i.e., a document allowing me to have the CEO of Sprint arrested and brought to court to explain his failure to appear at the prior hearings) and an Execution (i.e., a document allowing me to have a sheriff or constable seize property from Sprint and action it off to settle the judgment debt).

Fortunately, I didn’t end up having to figure out how to use either of these options, which would have been difficult since the CEO of Sprint and its corporate headquarters are in Virginia, because I received from Sprint yesterday via DHL a check for $823.62, the total amount of the judgment in my favor.

(more…)

Dealing with missing work for the Jewish holidays

Friday, August 31st, 2007

Someone recently asked this on a mailing list I’m on:

I am once again faced with the situation of having to take my vacation days for the Jewish High Holidays. Instead of passively standing by, I plan to take this issue up with my company and human resources department, as I am tired of corporate America assuming everyone is of a Christian faith. I am looking for some advice on how to handle this situation, if anyone has dealt with this before and would not mind sharing that would be greatly appreciated.

I think my response is worth blogging:

(more…)

Wanna send someone a bottle of booze? Think again!

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

I recently decided to send a bottle of Scotch to a friend as a gift.  Guess what?  You Can’t Do That.  FedEx, UPS and the USPS all refuse to accept packages containing alcoholic beverages.  FedEx and UPS both said that a license is required to ship alcoholic beverages.  The USPS simply says that alcoholic beverages are “non-mailable.”

The law varies from state to state.  I knew that Massachusetts regulated direct shipments from wineries and other merchants, but I did not realize that said regulations also apply to personal shipments.  Actually, it’s possible that they don’t, and that FedEx and UPS simply refuse to ship them at all because they don’t want to be in the business of figuring out which shipments to allow.

*sigh*

Speed kills

Sunday, April 22nd, 2007

Four teens were killed, and a fifth critically injured, in a single-vehicle car accident in Leicester last Friday night. The driver of the car was traveling at over twice the speed limit. The local high school principal was quoted in the paper as saying, “It’s not like they did anything wrong.” I just sent the following letter to several area newspapers:

(more…)

Lawyer: Abusing foreign children is OK

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Seen in yesterday’s Boston Herald in a letter from Geoffrey Nathan, an attorney of an alleged child pornographer:

“In purchasing kiddie porn, users abuse children who live in distant countries.  Who really cares about incarcerating U.S. citizens for looking at pictures on their computers, when the pictures ware taken thousands of miles away?  Are we not sick of the argument that the United States is responsible for nation-building?”

Apparently, as far as Mr. Nathan is concerned, consuming child pornography produced by abusing American children is wrong, but hey, if it’s those darn foreigners who are being abused, go for it!

Unbelievable.